RISK ASSESSMENT OF ACUTE POSTMANIPULATED PANCREATITIS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF INTRAOPROPOSITION ANTERGRADE ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOSPHINCTEROMY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Retrospective analysis of surgical treatment of complicated cholelithiasis with the use of intraoperative antegrade endoscopic papillosphincterotomy (IAEPST) in 438 patients admitted for the period from 2010 to 2017. In a planned order, 325 patients (74.2 %) were admitted, in an emergency 113 patients (25.8 %). The age of patients ranged from 18 to 87 years.
Objective. Assess the risk of developing acute post-manipulation pancreatitis when performing an IAEPST in groups of planned and emergency patients.
Methods. The IAEPST was performed by an antegrade technique with a tension-type papillotome institution through the cystic duct and removing its working part through the mouth of the large duodenal papilla. Papillotom was installed in the working position for 11 hours and papillotomy was performed. In the subsequent papillotom, the bile duct was removed and performed a Dormia basket or balloon catheter.
Results. In the group of planned patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in combination with IAEPST was performed in 318 patients (97.8 %). In 5 cases (1.5 %), a conversion was performed for laparotomic access. From minilaparotomic access cholecystectomy with an IAEPST was performed in 2 patients (0.7 %). In the group of emergency patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in combination with IAEPST was performed in 97 patients (85.8 %). From minilaparotomy access, treatment was performed in 1 patient (0.9 %). Laparotomic access was applied in 15 patients (13.3 %). The percentage of acute post-manipulation development in both groups was 0.75 %, no statistically significant differences in both groups (p > 0,1) were found.
Conclusion. The incidence of acute post-manipulation pancreatitis with the use of an IAEPST is 0.75 %. The use of an IAEPST is an effective alternative to the retrograde method of reducing the number of post-manipulation complications.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Galperin EI, Vetshev PS. Guide to biliary tract surgery. M.: Vidar-M publishing house, 2009. 568 p. Russian (Гальперин Э.И., Ветшев П.С. Руководство по хирургии желчных путей. М.: Издательский дом «Видар-М», 2009. 568 с.)
Mo LR, Chang KK, Wang CH et al. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of patients with сholedocholithiasis. H.P.B. Surgery. 2002; 9(2): 191-195
Okhotnikov OI, Yakovleva MV, Grigoriev SN, Pakhomov VI. Antegrade Endobiliary Interventions in Treatment of Complicated Gall Stone Disease. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2013; 18(1): 29-37. Russian (Охотников О.И., Яковлева М.В., Григорьев С.Н. Пахомов В.И. Антеградные эндобилиарные вмешательства в лечении осложненной желчнокаменной болезни //Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2013. Т. 18, № 1. С. 29-37)
Sedov VM, Luchkin AN, Rutenburg GM et al. Two-stage treatment of calculous cholecystitis complicated by choledocholithiasis and biliary-related pancreatitis. Almanac of the Institute of Surgery im. A.V. Vishnevsky. 2010; 5(1): 108. Russian (Седов В.М., Лучкин А.Н., Рутенбург Г.М. и др. Двухэтапное лечение калькулезного холецистита, осложненного холедохолитиазом и билиарнозависимым панкреатитом //Альманах института хирургии им. А.В. Вишневского. 2010. Т. 5, № 1(1). С. 108)
Balalykin AS. ERPHG, EPT and trans-papillary operations - successes and problems. Third Moscow International Congress on Endoscopic Surgery. Collection of theses. Ed. prof. Gallinger YuI. M., 1999; 22-24. Russian (Балалыкин А.С. ЭРПХГ, ЭПТ и чреспапиллярные операции – успехи и проблемы //Третий Московский Международный конгресс по эндоскопической хирургии. Сборник тезисов /под ред. проф. Ю.И. Галлингера. М., 1999; 22-24)
Wojtun S, Gil J, Zysko B. The use of endoscopic method in treatment of strictures of biliary tree. Polski merkuriusz lekarski. 2007; 22(131): 477-481
Ong TZ, Khor JL, Selamat DS, Yeoh KG, Ho KY. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: a tertiary center experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11(33): 5209-5212
Osumbekov RB. Variants of clinical manifestation of retroduodenal perforation at endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2017; 13(3): 544-548. Russian (Осумбеков Р.Б. Варианты клинической манифестации ретродуоденальной перфорации при проведении эндоскопической папиллосфинктеротомии //Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2017. Т. 13, № 3. С. 544-548)
Wilcox CM, Canakis J, Mönkemüller KE, Bondora AW, Geels W. Patterns of bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy, the subsequent risk of bleeding, and the role of epinephrine injection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(2): 244-248
Prokofeva AV, Nazarenko PM, Kopylov AA. Improvement of minimally invasive methods of transpapillary treatment of choledocholithiasis and stenosis of the papilla of vater. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013; 5: 291-297. Russian (Прокофьева А.В., Назаренко П.М., Копылов А.А. Совершенствование малоинвазивных способов транспапиллярного разрешения холедохолитиаза и стеноза большого сосочка двенадцатиперстной кишки (БСДК) //Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2013. № 5. С. 291-297)