FEATURES SPEECH REHABILITATION IN THE ACUTE STROKE IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF APHASIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective. To determine the dependence of speech recovery on the type of aphasia, localization of the focus of ischemia and vascular risk factors in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the carotid basin.
Material and methods. 351 patients with ischemic stroke were examined, median age – 61 (55; 72). The degree of speech recovery was characterized by an increase in the score on the scale of the speech questionnaire (ΔSQ) on the 21st day from the onset of the disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with a low level of recovery – ΔSQ ≤ 6; with a high level – ΔSQ > 6. Speech disorders were represented by motor and sensorimotor aphasia. The influence of localization of ischemia focus in the brain, arterial hypertension, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, stenosis of extracranial arteries on aphasia regression was evaluated.
Results. The group ΔSQ ≤ 6 was dominated by patients with sensorimotor aphasia: n = 141 (76,6 %). In the group ΔSQ > 6 motor aphasia was more common – 119 people (71,3 %), sensorimotor aphasia was observed in 48 patients (28,7 %) (p = 0,0001). In patients of the group ΔSQ ≤ 6, the ischemic focus more often had cortical-subcortical localization (p = 0,006), groups ΔSQ > 6 – subcortical (p = 0,001). The group ΔSQ ≤ 6 was dominated by patients with a constant form of atrial fibrillation (p = 0,031) and extracranial artery stenosis more than 50 % (p = 0,0001).
Conclusions. With a low level of speech restoration function in the acute period of ischemic stroke associated cortical-subcortical ischemic focus, stenosis of the brachiocephalic arteries over 50 % and a constant form of atrial fibrillation, with a high level – speech disorders by type of motor aphasia.Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Mortality GBD. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 385(9963): 117-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61682-2
Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014; 383: 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4
Engelter S, Gostynski М, Рара S, Frei М, Born С, Ajdacic-Gross V et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006; 37(6): 1379-1384. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000221815.64093.8c
Marinescu DC. Post-stroke aphasia recovery: actual understanding, future perspectives. Romanian Journal of Neurology. 2010; IX(4): 172-174
Pedersen PM, Jоrgensen HS, Nakayama Н, Raaschou НО, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery. Annals of Neurology.1995; 38(4): 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380416
Sekhon J, Douglas J, Rose М. Current Australian speech-language pathology practice in addressing psychological well-being in people with aphasia after stroke. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2015; 17(3): 252-262. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1024170
Pajlozyan ZhA. Aphasiology: stages of development and topical issues. Medical Science of Armenia. 2011; 51(1): 27-37. Russian (Пайлозян Ж.А. Афазиология: этапы развития и актуальные вопросы //Медицинская наука Армении. 2011. № 51(1). С. 27-37)
Kadykov AC, Shahparonova NV, Kashina EM. Prognostic factors for recovery of speech in stroke patients. Selected Issues of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Saratov. 2000: 30. Russian (Кадыков A.C., Шахпаронова Н.В., Кашина Е.М. Прогностические факторы восстановления речи у больных, перенесших инсульт //Избранные вопросы неврологии и нейрохирургии. Саратов, 2000. С. 30)
Alferova VV, Shklovskij VM, Ivanova EG, Ivanov GV, Majorova LA, Petrushevskij AG et al. Prognosis of post-stroke aphasia. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018; 118(4): 20-29. Russian (Алферова В.В., Шкловский В.М., Иванова Е.Г., Иванов Г.В., Майорова Л.А., Петрушевский А.Г. и др. Прогноз постинсультной афазии //Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. C.C. Корсакова. 2018. Т. 118, № 4. С. 20-29. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20181184120-29
Kut'kin DV, Babanina EA, Shevtsov YuA. Left middle cerebral artery stroke: the correlation between speech disorders and cerebral infarction. RMJ. 2016; 26: 1747-1751. Russian (Кутькин Д.В., Бабанина Е.А., Шевцов Ю.А. Инсульт в бассейне левой средней мозговой артерии: соотношение речевых нарушений с вариантом инфаркта головного мозга //РМЖ. 2016. № 24(26). С. 1747-1751)
Pedersen РМ, Vinterb К, Olsen ТS. Aphasia after Stroke: Type, Severity and Prognosis. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2003; 17(1): 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073896
Laska A, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2001; 249(5): 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x
Ahmetzyanova AI, Kornijchenko TYu, Boltakova NI, Suzdal'ceva LN. Speech pathology. Textbook for students of correspondence Department. Edited by Akhmetzyanova AI. Kazan, 2012. 167 p. Russian (Ахметзянова А.И., Корнийченко Т.Ю., Болтакова Н.И., Суздальцева Л.Н. Патология речи. Учебное пособие для студентов заочного отделения. Под ред. А.И. Ахметзяновой. Казань, 2012. 167 с.)
Astaeva AV, Epaneshnikova NV. On the characteristics of neuropsychological speech disorders in severe violations of cerebral circulation and the problem of classifying in domestic and foreign neuropsychology. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology. 2012; 6(265): 73-79. Russian (Астаева А.В., Епанешникова Н.В. Нейропсихологическая характеристика нарушений речи при острых нарушениях мозгового кровообращения и проблемы их классификации в отечественной и зарубежной нейропсихологии //Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Психология. 2012. № 6(265). С. 73-79)
Belopasova AV, Kadykov AS, Shahparonova NV, Berdnikovich ES. The volume of the lesion of the brain – the main factor affecting the nature and dynamics of recovery of post-stroke aphasia. In: The materials of the X All-Russian Congress of neurologists with international participation. Nizhny Novgorod, 2012. Р. 22. Russian (Белопасова А.В., Кадыков А.С., Шахпаронова Н.В., Бердникович Е.С. Объем очага повреждения головного мозга – главный фактор, влияющий на характер и динамику восстановления постинсультной афазии //Сборник трудов X Всероссийского съезда неврологов с международным участием. Нижний Новгород, 2012. С. 22)
Kadykov AS, Shahparonova NV, Konovalova EV. Prognosis of restoration of disturbed functions in patients with different mechanisms of ischemic stroke. Almanach of Clinical Medicine. 2001; 4: 14-15. Russian (Кадыков А.С., Шахпаронова Н.В., Коновалова Е.В. Прогноз восстановления нарушенных функций у больных с разными механизмами развития ишемического инсульта //Альманах клинической медицины. 2001.№ 4. С. 14-15)
Shahparonova NV. Clinical factors determining speech recovery in patients with ischemic stroke: cand. med. sci. abstracts diss. M., 1994. 32 р. Russian (Шахпаронова Н.В. Клинические факторы, определяющие восстановление речи у больных ишемическим инсультом: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 1994. 32 с.)