Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective – to evaluate the inflammatory response within the first 24 hours postoperative period in patients who underwent resection surgery for colon cancer under different types of anesthesia.
Methods: laboratory, statistics.
Results. Levels of interleukin 6, 10, C-reactive protein in the blood of patients operated on for colon cancer under multicomponent multimodal anesthesia, analgesia and superficial sympathetic blockade in the first 24 postoperative hours are higher than in patients operated on under inhalation-intravenous anesthesia and systemic pain relief after the surgery. Levels of interleukin 6, 10, C-reactive protein in the blood of patients operated on for colon cancer under multicomponent multimodal anesthesia, analgesia and superficial sympathetic blockade, supplemented with local infiltration anesthesia, are lower than those of patients operated under the same type of anesthesia-analgesia, but without the local infiltration anesthesia.
Conclusions. Superficial sympathetic blockade enhances and local infiltration anesthesia reduces the inflammatory response early after the resection surgery for colon cancer, keeping all advantages of multimodal analgesia-anesthesia as an effective means of protection against surgical stress.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Weledji EP. Cytocines and postoperative hyperglycemia – from Claude Bernard to ERAS. Int J Surg Research. 2014; 3(1): 1-6
Kessler J, Marhofer P, Hopkins PM, Hollmann MW. Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcome: lessons learned from the last 10 years. Br J Anaesth. 2015; 114(5): 728-745
Weledji EP, Accob JC. The systemic response to surgical trauma – a reviev. East Cen Afr J Surg. 2012; 17(2): 3-12
Weledji EP. Citocynes and metabolic response to surgery. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2014; 5(1): 1-5
Van Liver F, van der Geest PJ, Hoeks SE, van Gestel YR, Holl JW, Sin DD et al. Epidural analgesia is associated with improved health outcomes of surgical patients with COPD. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115: 315-321
Leslie K, Miles P, Devereaux P, Williamson E, Rao-Melancini P, Forbes A et al. Neuraxial block, death and serious cardiovascular morbidity in the POISE trial. Br J Anaesth.2013; 111: 382-390
Guay J, Choi PT, Surech S, Albert N, Kopp S, Pace NL. Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Anesth Analg. 2014; 19(3): 716-725
Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, Wong CS, Yen CC, Sheen MJ et al. Comparison of the effect of thoracic epidural analgesia and i. v. infusion with lidocaine on cytocine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colon surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97(5): 640-646
Halaby WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ et al. Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analisis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(2): 130-136
Day A, Smith R, Jourdan I, Fawcett WW, Scott M, Roccal T. Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109(1): 185-190
Adas G, Kemik A, Adas M. Metabolic and inflammatory responses after ERCP. Int J of Biomed Science. 2013: 9(4): 237-242
Forget P, De Kock M. Perspectives in anaesthesia for cancer surgery. J Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2014; 140(1): 353-359
Jackson RS, Amdur RL, White JC, Macsata RA. Hyperglycemia is associated with increased risk of morbidity after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 241(1): 68-80
Gupta G, Björnsson A, Fredriksson M, Halböök O, Eintrei C. Reduction of mortality after epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing rectal but non colonic cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of data from 655 patients in Central Sweden. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107(2): 196-203