FEATURES OF THE COURSE OF PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH IN PATIENTS WITH A CORPORAL SCAR ON THE UTERUS FROM A CAESAREAN SECTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the research – to study the clinical and anamnestic features of the course of pregnancy in patients with a corporal scar on the uterus from a caesarean section.
Material and methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, which included 55 pregnant women with one uterine scar from a caesarean section, which were divided into two groups: the main group (n = 23) – pregnant women with a corporal uterine scar after cesarean section, comparison group (n = 32) – pregnant women with one scar on the uterus from a caesarean section performed in the lower segment. Anamnestic data were analyzed (the course of the present and previous pregnancy).
Results. It was found that in patients with a corporal scar on the uterus, the most common complication of pregnancy is the formation of fetoplacental insufficiency with an outcome in fetal growth retardation syndrome OR = 3,47 (ДИ 95% 1,24; 9,72), and the threat of abortion. Patients with a history of corporal caesarean section are at risk for preterm birth. One of the main indications for abdominal delivery, patients with a corporal scar on the uterus is, the threat of uterine rupture along the scar OR = 2.4 (95% CI 1.43; 4.03), and detachment of a normally located placenta OR = 5.5 (95% CI 2.45; 9 .65). An inferior uterine scar from caesarean section was significantly more often detected in patients with a corporal uterine scar OR = 4.12 (95% CI 1.34; 8.23).
Conclusion. Patients with a corporal scar on the uterus are at risk for the formation of obstetric complications.Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Shchukina NA, Buianova SN, Chechneva MA, Zemskova NIu, Barinova IV, Puchkova NV, Blagina EI. Main reasons for the formation of an incompetent uterine scar after cesarean section. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2018; 18(4): 57-61. Russian (Щукина Н.А., Буянова С.Н., Чечнева М.А., Земскова Н.Ю., Баринова И.В., Пучкова Н.В., Благина Е.И. Основные причины формирования несостоятельного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения //Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2018. Т. 18, № 4. С. 57-61.) DOI: 10.17116/rosakush201818457
Zemskova NYu, Chechneva MA, Petrukhin VA, Lukashenko SYu. Ultrasound examination of the cesarean scar in the prognosis of pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; 10: 99-104. Russian (Земскова Н.Ю., Чечнева М.А., Петрухин В.А., Лукашенко С.Ю. Ультразвуковое исследование рубца на матке после кесарева сечения в прогнозе исхода беременности //Акушерство и гинекология. 2020. № 10. С. 99-104.) DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.10.99-104
Gustovarova TA. Pregnancy and childbirth in women with a uterine scar: clinical, morphological and diagnostic aspects: Abstr. diss. … doct. med. sciences. M., 2007. 48 p.Russian (Густоварова Т.А. Беременность и роды у женщин с рубцом на матке: клинико-морфологические и диагностические аспекты: Автореф. дисс. … докт. мед. наук. М., 2007. 48 c.)
Lower Uterine Segment Trial (LUSTrial). Ultrasound Measure of the Thickness of the Lower Segment in Women Having a History of Caesarian. 2014, Clinical Trials. gov. Identifi er: NCT01916044. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/study/NCT01916044
Grace L, Nezhat A. Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparoscopically? A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(5): 843. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.030
Dobrokhotova YuE, Kerchelaeva SB, Kuznetsova OV, Burdenko MV. Premature birth: analysis of perinatal outcomes. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health. 2015; 23(20): 1220-1223. Russian (Доброхотова Ю.Э., Керчелаева С.Б., Кузнецова О.В., Бурденко М.В. Преждевременные роды: анализ перинатальных исходов //РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2015. Т. 23, № 20. С. 1220-1223)
Kogan OM, Voytenko NB, Zosimova EA, Martynova EN, Nersesayn DM, Bubnikovich AA. Algorithm for the management of patients with incompetence of postoperative uterine scar after a cesarean section, our clinical experience. Journal of Clinical Practice. 2018; 9(3): 38-43. Russian (Коган О.М, Войтенко Н.Б., Зосимова Е.А., Мартынова Э.Н., Нерсесян Д.М., Бубникович А.А. Алгоритм ведения пациенток с несостоятельностью послеоперационного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения //Клиническая практика. 2018. Т. 9, № 3. С. 38-43.) DOI: 10.17816/clinpract09338-43
Baeza S, Mottet N, Coppola S, Desmaretz M, Ramanah R, Riethmuller D. Obstetrical prognosis of patients after a previous cesarean section performed before 32 weeks of amenorrhea. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016; 44(11): 629-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.09.007