Main Article Content

Vitaly Fedorovich Nesterov
Galina Borisovna Malgina
Maria Mikhailovna Dyakova
Alena Vladimirovna Kayumova
Artem Alekseevich Denisov

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and condition of the uterine scar, as well as the characteristics of childbirth in patients with a history of two or more cesarean sections (CS).
Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis of childbirth cases in patients with one, two, and three cesarean sections in the Sverdlovsk region over a five-year period (2021-2025) was conducted. A total of 27116 birth histories were analyzed and divided into three groups: patients with one CS (n = 20496), patients with two CS (n = 5590), and patients with three or more CS (n = 1030). Scar condition (based on surgical records), the incidence of early and late complications, and characteristics of childbirth were assessed.
Results. A 9.9% decrease in the proportion of patients with one uterine scar was found (2025 compared to 2021). A 19.2% increase in the proportion of patients with a history of three CS was also noted. The risk of uterine rupture with an increased number of CS in the anamnesis increases by three to eight times. This is associated with an increased proportion of uterine scar insufficiency after multiple operative deliveries. With each subsequent CS, the incidence of insufficiency of the scar in the subsequent pregnancy increases – OR 4.56; 95% CI [2.34-9.76]. An increase in the number of CS performed prior to the current pregnancy increases the risk of placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies. With an increasing number of prior cesareans, the average duration of surgery and average blood loss were increased. Adhesions were three times more common in patients with three or more prior cesareans compared to one prior cesarean. Among intraoperative complications, bladder injury occurred more frequently in patients with two or more prior cesareans, requiring additional interventions, including the involvement of related specialists. Postpartum hemorrhage was twice as common in patients with three or more uterine scars. An analysis of postpartum morbidity revealed a trend toward an increasing proportion of purulent-septic complications with an increasing number of prior cesareans.
Conclusion. Each subsequent cesarean section increases the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies, especially with repeat abdominal deliveries. Childbirth in such patients should be performed in a highly qualified facility with access to related specialists.

Keywords

uterine scar, cesarean section, placenta accreta, uterine rupture, adhesions, bleeding, postpartum endometritis

Author Biographies

Vitaly Fedorovich Nesterov,

candidate of medical sciences, head of the maternity department

Galina Borisovna Malgina,

doctor of medical sciences, professor, academic secretary

Maria Mikhailovna Dyakova,

candidate of medical sciences

Alena Vladimirovna Kayumova,

candidate of medical sciences, docent, deputy director of obstetrics and gynecology

Artem Alekseevich Denisov,

candidate of medical sciences

Article Details

Information about financing and conflict of interests

The study had no sponsorship.
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

How to Cite

Nesterov, V. F., Malgina, G. B., Dyakova, M. M., Kayumova, A. V., & Denisov, A. A. (2026). ANALYSIS OF DELIVERY OF PATIENTS WITH TWO OR MORE PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTIONS. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass, 2, 20-25. https://mednauki.ru/index.php/MD/article/view/1444

References

1. Backley S, Chen HY, Sibai BM, Chauhan SP, Bartal MF. The association between number of repeat cesarean deliveries and adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 159(1): 246-253. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14092

2. Deneux-Tharaux C. Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012; 41(8): 697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022

3. Wei X, Cheng W. Impact of Prior Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcomes and Hemorrhage Risks in Complete Placenta Previa: A Decade-Long Retrospective Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30: e944432. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944432

4. Jauniaux E, Fox KA, Einerson B, Hussein AM, Hecht JL, Silver RM. Perinatal assessment of complex cesarean delivery: beyond placenta accreta spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 229(2): 129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.021

5. Hentrich AE, Brüggmann D, Hoock SC, Deuster E, Buslowicz JT, Bresgen J, et al. Is it safe for women with a history of two cesarean deliveries to undergo a vaginal delivery attempt in comparison to patient with a history of one cesarean delivery? PLoS One. 2025; 20(8): e0330216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330216

6. Alamo L, Vial Y, Denys A, Andreisek G, Meuwly J-Y, Schmidt S. MRI fi ndings of complications related to previous uterine scars. Eur J Radiol Open. 2018; 5: 6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.01.001

7. Muñoz-Saá LE, Sendra R, Carriles I, Sousa M, Turiel M, Ruiz-Zambrana Á, Chiva L. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes after Multiple Cesarean Deliveries. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15): 4425. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154425

8. Bates GW Jr, Shomento S. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(6 Suppl): 19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.030

9. Nun ELB, Sela HY, Joseph J, Rudelson G, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M. Prolonged operative time of cesarean is a risk marker for subsequent cesarean maternal complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 307(3): 739-746. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06575-4

10. Vuchenovich YuD, Novikova VA, Radzinsky VE. The success of an attempt to deliver through the natural birth canal after two cesarean sections. What are the chances? Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2020; 20(5): 61‑67. Russian (Вученович Ю.Д., Новикова В.А., Радзинский В.Е. Успех попытки родов через естественные родовые пути после двух кесаревых сечений. Каковы шансы? //Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2020. Т. 20, № 5. С. 61‑67.) doi: 10.17116/rosakush20202005161

11. Charitou A, Charos D, Vamenou I, Vivilaki VG. Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women giving birth after previous cesarean. Eur J Midwifery. 2019; 3: 8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/108297

12. Vuchenovich YuD, Olenev AS, Novikova VA, Radzinsky VE. Cesarean section: border risks and safety. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019; 7(3): 93-101. Russian (Вученович Ю.Д., Оленев А.С., Новикова В.А., Радзинский В.Е. Кесарево сечение: границы рисков и безопасности //Акушерство и гинекология: новости мнения, обучение. 2019. Т. 7, № 3. С. 93-101.) doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13014

13. Occhi GM, de Lamare FNT, Neri MA, Rodrigues EAB, Fernandes ALV. Strategic measures to reduce the caesarean section rate in Brazil. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155): 1290-1291. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32407-3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.