ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS WITH INTRAVAGINAL DRUGS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the study was to improve the results of treatment of women of reproductive age with bacterial vaginosis.
Currently, the question of effective therapy of bacterial vaginosis remains open. A variety of treatment regimens for bacterial vaginosis pose to the clinician the question of choosing an adequate therapy for this disease. This article presents a comparative analysis of common treatment regimens for bacterial vaginosis.
The study was conducted with the participation of 120 women from 18 to 45 years old living in Novosibirsk. The effectiveness of 4 treatment regimens for bacterial vaginosis with the use of drugs for vaginal administration was studied: metronidazole in gel form, clindamycin in cream form, chlorhexidine bigluconate in the form of vaginal tablets and a complex preparation containing ornidazole, neomycin, prednisolone, econazole.
Based on the presented data, a conclusion is made about a more effective integrated approach to the treatment of bacterial vaginosis than with the use of schemes with the isolated use of single-component antibacterial drugs.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Gynecology: national guide /ed. G.M. Savelieva, G.T. Sukhikh, V.N. Serova, V.E. Radzinsky, I.B. Manukhin. 2nd ed., revised. and additional M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 1008 p. Russian (Гинекология: национальное руководство /под ред. Г.М. Савельевой, Г.Т. Сухих, В.Н. Серова, В.Е. Радзинского, И.Б. Манухина 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020. 1008 с.)
Khuraseva AB, Reminnaya TV. Bacterial vaginosis – what kind of animal? Regional Bulletin. 2020; 2(41): 3-4. Russian (Хурасева А.Б., Реминная Т.В. Бактериальный вагиноз – что за зверь? //Региональный вестник. 2020. № 2(41). С. 3-4)
Ledina AV. Vaginal discharge: causes, algorithm of patient management, modern approaches to treatment and their prevention. Obstetrics and gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019; 7(3): 107-111. Russian (Ледина А.В. Вагинальные выделения: причины, алгоритм ведения пациенток и современные подходы к лечению и профилактике //Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2019. Т. 7, № 3. С. 107-111.) doi: 10.24411/ 2303-9698-2019-13016
Lamont RF. Advances in the Prevention of Infection-Related Preterm Birth. Front Immunol. 2015; 6(16): 566. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00566
Marinkin IO, Trunchenko NV, Seryapina YuV, Nikitenko ЕV, Makarov KYu, Кuleshov VМ, Аidаgulovа SV. Chronic endometritis with normal and thin endometrium during treatment of reproductive-age women: ultrasound and histological correlations. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2017; 23(1): 29-36. Russian (Маринкин И.О., Трунченко Н.В., Серяпина Ю.В., Никитенко Е.В., Макаров К.Ю., Кулешов В.М., Айдагулова С.В. Хронический эндометрит с нормальным и тонким эндометрием в динамике реабилитации пациенток репродуктивного возраста: ультразвуковые и гистологические корреляции //Проблемы репродукции. 2017. Т. 23, № 1. С. 29-36)
Rakhmatulina MR, Malova IO, Sokolovsky EV, Savicheva AM, Apolikhina IA, Melkumyan AG. Federal clinical guidelines for the management of patients with bacterial vaginosis. M., 2015. 15 p. Russian (Рахматулина М.Р., Малова И.О., Соколовский Е.В., Савичева А.М., Аполихина И.А.. Мелкумян А.Г. Федеральные клинические рекомендации по ведению больных бактериальным вагинозом». М., 2015. 15 с.)
Zozaya M, Ferris MJ, Siren JD, Lillis R, Myers L, Nsuami MJ, et al. Bacterial communities in penile skin, male urethra, and vaginas of heterosexual couples with and without bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome. 2016; 4: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-016-0161-6
Muzny CA, Taylor CM, Swords WE, Tamhane A, Chattopadhyay D, Cerca N, Schwebke JR. An updated conceptual model on the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis. 2019; 220(9): 1399-1405. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz342
Petricevic L, Domig K, Nierscher FJ, et al. Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 51362. doi: 10.1038/srep05136
Smirnova EI. Threat of abortion and bacterial vaginosis: is there a connection? Journal of new medical technologies. 2017; 1: 118-123. Russian (Смирнова Е.И. Угроза прерывания беременности и бактериальный вагиноз: есть ли связь? //Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2017. № 1. С. 118-123.) DOI: 10.12737/25076
Son KA, Kim M, Kim YM, Kim SH, Choi SJ, Oh SY, et al. Prevalence of vaginal microorganisms among pregnant women according to trimester and association with preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018; 61(1): 38-47. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.38
Cheng Q, Nelson D, Zhu S, Fischetti VA. Removal of group B streptococci colonizing the vagina and oropharynx of mice with a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49(1): 111-117. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.111-117.2005
Donders GG, Ruban K, Bellen G. Selecting anti-microbial treatment of aerobic vaginitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015; 17(5): 477. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0477-6
Wang H, Huang Z, Wu Z, QiX, Lin D. An epidemiological study on vaginitis in 6,150 women of reproductive age in Shanghai. New Microbiol. 2017; 40(2): 113-118