Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim of the present study was to optimize the anesthesia aid for endoscopic manipulations based on the determination of the patient's functional change index (IFI).
Materials and methods. We examined 34 patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy or biopsy, the average age was 45.7 ± 5.9 years, the degree of anesthetic risk was consistent with ASA I-II, the duration of the procedure was 20.3 ± 7.1 minutes. IFI (in conventional units-points) was calculated immediately before endoscopic manipulation. To calculate it, we determined the pulse rate( PE), blood pressure (ADp-systolic, ADp-diastolic), height (P), body weight (MT) and age (B): IFI = 0.011PE + 0.014ADp + 0.008ADp + 0.014B + 0.009MT – 0.009P – 0.27.
During the anesthesia support, the opinion of not only the doctor who conducted the study, but also the patients about the comfort during the EVPV was taken into account.
Results. Based on the obtained index value, each subject was assigned to one of four groups according to the degree of adaptation: satisfactory adaptation (IFI less than 2.59), stress of adaptation mechanisms (IFI from 2.6 to 3.09), unsatisfactory adaptation (IFI from 3.1 to 3.49), failure of adaptation (IFI more than 3.5).
In the first group of patients, dexmedetomidine sedation was sufficient to achieve comfortable conditions for both the patient and the endoscopist. In the second group, the recommended dosages of dexmedetomidine were insufficient, which required additional administration of propofol. At the same time, there was a decrease in the average blood pressure below 70 mm hg. In this regard, the second group was divided into two subgroups: patients who were sedated with dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol (n = 10) and patients (n = 10) who were sedated only with propofol, which allowed them to achieve the necessary level of sedation for high-quality manipulation without significant arterial hypotension.
Conclusion. The calculation of the IFI and the determination of the patient's adaptive potential before endoscopic intervention allows us to optimize the anesthetic manual and make a rational choice of the drug for sedation. Thus, when the adaptation mechanisms are stressed, it is sufficient to achieve the required level of dexmedetomidine sedation in the recommended dosages. When identifying a state of unsatisfactory adaptation, the drug of choice is propofol.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Sedation in the intensive care unit: clinical recommendations. M., 2015. 33 p. Russian (Седация в палате интенсивной терапии: клинические рекомендации. М., 2015. 33 с.)
Paspatis GA, Manolaraki MM, Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Vardas E, Konstantinidis K, et al. Endoscopic sedation in Greece: results from a nationwide survey for the Hellenic Foundation of gastroenterology and nutrition. Dig Liver Dis. 2009; 41(11): 807-811. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.03.003
Kazantsev DA, Popov AS, Ekstrem AV. Objectification of pain syndrome for the purpose of creating an individual protocol of postoperative analgesia in anesthesiology and resuscitation. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015; (4). Russian (Казанцев Д.А., Попов А.С., Экстрем А.В. Объективизация болевого синдрома с целью создания индивидуального протокола послеоперационного обезболивания в анестезиологии и реаниматологии //Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 4.) URL: www.science- education.ru/127-20898
Elgina SI, Ushakova GA, Nikulina EN. The reproductive system of full-term and premature newborn girls. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2016; 1(1): 39-45. Russian (Елгина С.И., Ушакова Г.А., Никулина Е.Н. Репродуктивная система доношенных и недоношенных новорожденных девочек //Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина. 2016. Т. 1, № 1. С. 39-45)
Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson AA, Miller KM, Durkalski V, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(5): 967-974. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00500.x
Kazantsev DA, Ekstrem AV, Popov AS. Implementation of protocols for the treatment of postoperative pain in the Volgograd region. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University. 2010; (1): 67-69. Russian (Казанцев Д.А., Экстрем А.В., Попов А.С. Внедрение протоколов лечения послеоперационной̆ боли в Волгоградской̆ области //Вестник Волгоградского государственного медицинского университета. 2010. № 1. С. 67-69)
Kitiashvili IZ, Vlasov AS, Parfenov L.L, Minkovetsky VD, Zaklyakov KK. Influence of various methods of anesthesia on the endocrine-metabolic link of the surgical stress response in hysterectomy. Regional Anesthesia and Treatment of Acute Pain. 2010; 4(3): 18-26. Russian (Китиашвили И.З., Власов А.С., Парфенов Л.Л., Миньковецкий В.Д., Закляков К.К. Влияние различных методов анестезии на эндокринно-метаболическое звено хирургического стресс-ответа при гистерэктомии //Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2010. Т. 4, № 3. С. 18-26)
Eligna SI. The reproductive system of girls at the time of birth and prevention of violations of its formation in the postnatal period: Abstr. dis. ... doct. med. sciences. Omsk, 2009. Russian (Елгина С.И. Репродуктивная система девочек на момент рождения и профилактика нарушений ее становления в постнатальном периоде: Автореф. дис. … докт. мед. наук. Омск, 2009)
Mc Quaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67(6): 910-923. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.046
Popov AS, Ekstrem AV, Kazantsev DA. Postoperative pain management in a complex of anaesthesia care based on perioperative pain evaluation. Fundamental Research. 2015; (1-9): 1907-1910. Russian (Попов А.С., Экстрем А.В., Казанцев Д.А. Послеоперационная анальгезия в комплексе анестезиологического пособия на основе объективизации периоперационной оценки боли //Фундаментальные исследования. 2015. № 1-9. С. 1907-1910)
Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012; 307(11): 1151-1160. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304
Ruokonen E, Parviainen I, Jakob SM, Nunes S, Kaukonen M, Shepherd ST, et al. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long- term sedation during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(2): 282-290. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1296-0
Venn RM, Karol MD, Grounds RM. Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine infusions for sedation of postoperative patients requiring intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88(5): 669-675. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.5.669