ADVANCED ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION AS A NON-INVASIVE METHOD OF DIAGNOSING DEEP ENDOMETRIOSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article describes the technique of extended ultrasound examination (UE) of the pelvic organs, abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space for the purpose of topical diagnosis of deep genital and extragenital endometriosis. This technique is recommended by leading Russian and world communities of specialists in the field of diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Special attention in the article is paid to ultrasound diagnostics of deep endometriosis, correct measurement and description of all identified foci. The article is illustrated by own ultrasound pictures from the clinical practice of the authors.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
1. Berger JP, Rhemrev J, Smeets M, Henneman O, English J, Jansen FW. Limited added value of magnetic resonance imaging after dynamic transvaginal ultrasound for preoperative staging of endometriosis in daily practice: a prospective cohort study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019; 38(4): 989-996. doi: 10.1002/jum.14808
2. Ugwumadu L, Chakrabarti R, Williams-Brown E, Rendle J, Swift I, John B, et al. The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Gynecol Surg. 2017; 14(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1018-0
3. Baușic AIG, Matasariu DR, Manu A, Brătilă E. Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Is the Optimal Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis? Biomedicines. 2023; 11(10): 2609. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102609
4. Guerriero S, Oyarce FH, Filippi F, Rolla M, Pedrassani M, Alcázar JL, et al. Ultrasound in Deep Endometriosis: A Narrative Review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025; 90(6): 560-575. doi: 10.1159/000543342
5. Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, Landolfo C, du Bois A, Chiva L, et al. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58(1): 148-168. doi: 10.1002/uog.23635
6. Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, et al. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement. Eur J Radiol. 2024; 176: 111450. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450
7. Fadinger N, Oppelt P, Trautner PS, Szilagyi I, Raidl S, Enzelsberger SH. Transforming the Enzian classification into a four-stage system: A feasibility study by comparison with the 2021 AAGL endometriosis classification. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025; 32(7): 639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017
8. Guerriero S, Condous G, Rolla M, Hudelist G, Ferrero S, Alcazar JL, et al. Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 64(2): 275-280. doi: 10.1002/uog.27558
9. Young SW, Jha P, Chamié L, Rodgers S, Kho R.M, Horrow MM, et al. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis. Radiology. 2024; 311(1): e232191. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232191
10. Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J, Abrao MS, Einarsson JI, Horne AW, et al. An International Terminology for Endometriosis, 2021. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021; 13(4): 295-304. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.4.036
11. Borisova EA, Bulanov MN, Makarenko TA, Ulyanova IO, Galkina DE. Ultrasound features of ovarian endometriomas. Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2025; 31(2) 14-39. Russian (Борисова Е.А., Буланов М.Н., Макаренко Т.А., Ульянова И.О., Галкина Д.Е. Особенности ультразвукового изображения эндометриом яичников //Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2025. Т. 31, № 2. С. 14-39.) doi: 10.24835/1607-0771-283
12. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022(2): hoac009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009
13. Guerriero S, Conway F, Pascual MA, Graupera B, Ajossa S, Neri M, et al. Ultrasonography and Atypical Sites of Endometriosis. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(6): 345. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10060345
14. Aas-Eng MK, Dauser B, Lieng M, Diep LM, Leonardi M, Condous G, Hudelist G. Transvaginal sonography accurately measures lesion-to-anal-verge distance in women with deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(5): 766-772. doi: 10.1002/uog.21995
15. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pascual MA, Rodriguez I, Piras A, Perniciano M, et al. Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(2): 269-273. doi: 10.1002/uog.20289
16. Ros C, de Guirior C, Mension E, Rius M, Valdés-Bango M, Tortajada M, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis involving uterosacral ligaments, torus uterinus and posterior vaginal fornix: prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58(6): 926-932. doi: 10.1002/uog.23696
17. Davydov AI, Mikhalyova LM, Khabarova MB, Chilova RA, Lebedev VA. Endometrioid cystadenoma – deep ovarian endometriosis. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2022; 21(3): 130-137. Russian (Давыдов А.И., Михалева Л.М., Хабарова М.Б., Чилова Р.А., Лебедев В.А. Эндометриоидная цистаденома – глубокий яичниковый эндометриоз //Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2022. Т. 21, № 3. С. 130-137.) doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2022-3-130-137
18. Keckstein J, Hoopmann M. Endometriosis, ultrasound and Enzian classification: the need for a common language for non-invasive diagnostics. Ultraschall Med. 2023; 44(3): 233-239. doi:10.1055/a-2055-6712
19. Strachowski LM, Jha P, Phillips CH, Blanchette Porter MM, Froyman W, Glanc P, et al. O-RADS US v2022: An Update from the American College of Radiology's Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US Committee. Radiology. 2023; 308(3): e230685. doi:10.1148/radiol.230685
20. Cohen Ben-Meir L, Mashiach R, Eisenberg VH. External Validation of the IOTA Classification in Women with Ovarian Masses Suspected to Be Endometrioma. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(13): 2971. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132971
21. Barra F, Zorzi C, Albanese M, Stepniewska A, Deromemaj X, De Mitri P, et al. Ultrasonographic Findings Indirectly Predicting Parametrial Involvement in Patients with Deep Endometriosis: The ULTRA-PARAMETRENDO I Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023; 30(1): 61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.10.008
22. Leonardi M, Espada M, Choi S, Chou D, Chang T, Smith C, et al. Transvaginal Ultrasound Can Accurately Predict the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Stage of Endometriosis Assigned at Laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(7): 1581-1587.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.014
23. Leonardi M, Martins WP, Espada M, Arianayagam M, Condous G. Proposed technique to visualize and classify uterosacral ligament deep endometriosis with and without infiltration into parametrium or torus uterinus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(1): 137-139. doi: 10.1002/uog.20300
24. Scioscia M, Scardapane A, Virgilio BA, Libera M, Lorusso F, Noventa M. Ultrasound of the Uterosacral Ligament, Parametrium, and Paracervix: Disagreement in Terminology between Imaging Anatomy and Modern Gynecologic Surgery. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(3): 437. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030437
25. Barra F, Ferrero S, Zorzi C, Evangelisti G, Perrone U, Valente I, et al. «From the tip to the deep of the iceberg»: Parametrial involvement in endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024; 94: 102493. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102493
26. Guerriero S, Martinez L, Gomez I, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Pagliuca M, Alcázar JL. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for detecting parametrial involvement in women with deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58(5): 669-676. doi: 10.1002/uog.23754
27. Szabó G, Madár I, Hudelist G, Arányi Z, Mázsár B, Rigó J, et al. Identification and characteristics of deep endometriosis infiltrating the sacral plexus with transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 62(S1): 20-21. doi: 10.1002/uog.26377
28. Aas-Eng MK, Keckstein J, Condous G, Abrão MS, Hudelist G. Deep endometriosis: Can surgical complexity and associated risk factors be evaluated with transvaginal sonography and classification systems? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022; 276: 204-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.011
29. Goncalves MO, Siufi Neto J, Andres MP, Siufi D, de Mattos LA, Abrao MS. Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(6): 1492-1500. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab085
30. Fernandez CM, Levine EM, Shashoua A, Tam MT, Diaz L. The expanding role of sonography for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: Results of a large case series. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 166(1): 326-332. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15418
31. Djokovic D, Pinto P, van Herendael BJ, Laganà AS, Thomas V, Keckstein J. Structured report for dynamic ultrasonography in patients with suspected or known endometriosis: Recommendations of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 263: 252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.035