Main Article Content

Юлия Алексеевна Дударева
Татьяна Викторовна Раченкова
Сергей Вадимович Дронов

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a step-by-step system for predicting late spontaneous miscarriages, taking into account clinical, anamnestic, echographic data, and the cytokine status of pregnant women.

Materials and methods. The comparative study consisted of two stages. A total of 260 women were included in the study. At the retrospective stage, the main group consisted of 66 patients with late spontaneous miscarriage at a gestational age of 10.0-21.6 weeks (17.8 ± 2.1 weeks). The control group included 90 patients whose pregnancy ended in term delivery. The prospective stage included patients with threatened late spontaneous miscarriage at a gestational age of 10.0-21.6 weeks (main group, n = 51), who were divided into two groups depending on the pregnancy outcome. The clinical and anamnestic, echographic data were assessed, the concentration of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 in the blood serum was determined by the enzyme immunoassay method using reagent kits. The data were processed using discriminant analysis, logistic regression and elements of mathematical modeling.

Results and discussion. The results obtained in the study allowed us to create a step-by-step forecasting system. The first developed prognostic model of the risk of late spontaneous miscarriage, based on clinical and anamnestic data, allows us to predict the risk of late spontaneous miscarriage with high efficiency, while 99.5% of cases are correctly classified. This model is not quite effective (AUC 0.60) in terms of predicting the implementation of a threatening late spontaneous miscarriage, for this purpose, the content of interleukins-6, -8, -10 in the blood was studied as potential predictors. Based on the obtained results, a prognostic model 2 was created, which allows assessing the risk of implementation (unfavorable outcome) of a threatened late spontaneous miscarriage.

Conclusion. The proposed algorithm of step-by-step forecasting will allow for correct stratification of the risk of late spontaneous miscarriage and personalized pregnancy management to reduce the risk of unfavorable outcomes.

Keywords

late spontaneous miscarriage, threatened late spontaneous miscarriage, predictors

Author Biographies

Юлия Алексеевна Дударева,
doctor of medical sciences, docent, professor of the department of obstetrics and gynecology with a course of continuing professional education
Татьяна Викторовна Раченкова,
postgraduate student of the department of obstetrics and gynecology with a course of continuing professional education
Сергей Вадимович Дронов,
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, docent of the department of mathematical analysis

Article Details

Information about financing and conflict of interests

The study had no sponsorship.
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

How to Cite

Дударева, Ю. А., Раченкова, Т. В., & Дронов, С. В. (2025). STEP-BY-STEP PREDICTION OF LATE SPONTANEOUS MISCARRIAGE. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass, 26(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-7338-2025-2-53-60

References

Dannye Federal'noj sluzhby gosudarstvennoj statistiki (date of access 28.06.2023) Russian (Данные Федеральной службы государственной статистики (дата обращения 28.06.2023г). http://gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/vita1_bd.htm

Borzova NYu, Ivanenkova NI, Sotnikova NYu, Malyshkina AI. New early prognostic criteria for pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage. Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2020; 65(5): 294-298. Russian (Борзова Н.Ю., Иваненкова Н.И., Сотникова Н.Ю., Малышкина А.И. Новые ранние прогностические критерии исхода беременности у пациенток с привычным выкидышем //Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2020. Т. 65, № 5. С. 294-298.) doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-5-294-298

Farzalieva AV, Sotnikova NYu, Borzova NYu. CD163 positive alternatively activated monocytes as a marker of early miscarriage. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 26(8): 71-85. Russian (Фарзалиева А.В., Сотникова Н.Ю., Борзова Н.Ю. CD163 положительные альтернативно активированные моноциты как маркер раннего выкидыша //Акушерство и гинекология. 2022. Т. 26, № 8. С. 71-85.) doi: 10.18565/aig.2022.8.71-75

Malyshkina AI, Sotnikova NYu, Grigushkina EV, Kroshkina NV, Talanova I.E. Prediction of the outcome of pregnancy in women with reccurent miscarriage. Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2021; 66(10): 618-622. Russian (Малышкина А.И., Сотникова Н.Ю., Григушкина Е.В., Крошкина Н.В., Таланова И.Е. Прогнозирование исхода беременности у женщин с привычным невынашиванием //Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2021. Т. 66, № 10. С. 618-622.) doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2021-66-10-618-622

Kastsova LV. Method for determining the risk of developing reproductive loss in the 1st trimester of pregnancy. Health and Ecology Issues. 2023; 1(20): 41-47. Russian (Косцова Л.В. Метод определения риска развития репродуктивной потери в I триместре беременности //Проблемы здоровья и экологии. 2023. Т. 20, № 1. С. 41-47.) doi: 10.51523/2708-6011.2023-20-1-05

Turgut E, Yildirim M, Sakcak B, Ayhan SG, Tekin OM, Sahin D. Predicting miscarriage using systemic immune-inflammation index. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022; 48(3): 587-592. doi: 10.1111/jog.15156

Soysal C, Sarı H, Işıkalan MM, Özkaya EB, Ulaş Ö, Taşçı Y, Keskin N. Role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in threatened abortion patients and predicting of abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023; 49(7): 1723-1728. doi: 10.1111/jog.15655

Mor A, Gardezi M, Jubanyik K, Simsek B, Seifer DB, Patrizio P, et al. Miscarriage determination in first trimester based on alpha-fetoprotein extracted from sanitary pads. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(2): 462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.10.006

Park H, Park KH, Kim YM, Kook SY, Jeon SJ, Yoo HN. Plasma inflammatory and immune proteins as predictors of intra-amniotic infection and spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 146. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1780-7

Borzova NYu, Radjabova NR, Sotnikova NYu, Kudryashova AV, Malyshkina AI. New prognostic criteria for pregnancy outcome in women with threatened premature labor. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. 2022; 2(67): 97-100. Russian (Борзова Н.Ю., Раджабова Н.Р., Сотникова Н.Ю., Кудряшова А.В., Малышкина А.И. Новый прогностический критерий исхода беременности у женщин с угрожающими преждевременными родами //Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2022. Т. 67, № 2. С. 97-100.) doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-2-97-100

Kaya B, Turhan U, Sezer S, Kaya S, Dağ İ, Tayyar A. Maternal serum galectin-1 and galectin-3 levels in pregnancies complicated with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020; 33(5): 861-868. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1637409

Faskhutdinova ZF, Bulatova G.A. Zhelezodeficitnaya anemiya kak faktor neblagopriyatnogo prognoza techeniya beremennosti i rodov, ante - i postnatal'nogo zdorov'ya rebenka. Nauchnyj Lider. 2021; 31(33): 30-34. Russian (Фасхутдинова З.Ф., Булатова Г.А. Железодефицитная анемия как фактор неблагоприятного прогноза течения беременности и родов, анте- и постнатального здоровья ребенка //Научный Лидер. 2021. № 31(33). С. 30-34)

Yang J, Li Q, Feng Y, Zeng Y. Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia: Potential Risk Factors in Bone Loss. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(8): 6891. doi: 10.3390/ijms24086891

Ailamazian EK, Shipitsyna EV, Savicheva AM. Woman’s microbiota and pregnancy outcomes. Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases. 2016; 65(4): 6-14. Russian (Айламазян Э.К., Шипицына Е.В., Савичева А.М. Микробиота женщины и исходы беременности //Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2016. Т. 65, № 4. С. 6-14.) doi: 10.17816/JOWD6546

Remneva OV, Chernova AE, Kolyado OV, Fadeeva NI. Medical and social risk factors for late miscarriage. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2022; 21(6): 73-78. Russian (Ремнёва О.В., Чернова А.Е., Колядо О.В., Фадеева Н.И. Медико-социальные факторы риска позднего самопроизвольного выкидыша //Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2022. Т. 21, № 6. С. 73-78.) doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2022-6-73-78

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)