Main Article Content

Ярослав Миронович Лещишин
Андрей Игоревич Баранов
Константин Владимирович Потехин
Александр Анатольевич Мартынов
Сергей Александрович Ярощук

Abstract

Laparostomy, as a technical method of completing the surgical manual has been used by surgeons for a long time. The most common indication is a common purulent peritonitis

Aim – evaluation of the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned sanitation as a method of treatment of common purulent peritonitis.

Materials and methods. A retrospective study of the use of planned sanitation and laparostomy, for the period from 2013 to 2015, in patients with widespread purulent peritonitis, its effectiveness. Evaluation criteria - mortality and the presence of postoperative complications diagnosed in the hospital. Inclusion criteria: patients with advanced purulent peritonitis in primary surgery requiring laparotomy. Exclusion criteria: severe immune disorders, CRF; pancreonecrosis; liver cirrhosis class C; carcinomatosis, cancer cachexia; disseminated tuberculosis; total mesenteric thrombosis.

Results. During this period, 101 medical records were selected. 48 men (47.5 %) and 53 women (52.5 %) each. The median age is 63.The whole group is divided into three subgroups according to the severity of peritonitis according to MPI: I st. – 20; II st. – 57; III st. – 24. In the first subgroup of UPS – Me – 10; in the second – 10; in the third – 13. Routine sanitation of the abdominal cavity in combination with the imposition laparostomy used in 34 cases (of 33.6 %). In the first subgroup twice (10 %), in the second subgroup – 18 (31.6 %), in the third – 14 (58.3 %). Number of dead – 32 (31.6 %). In each subgroup, mortality was respectively – 0; 17 (29.8 %); 15 (62.5 %).The number of complications: surface IHV – 3 (2.9 %), deep IHV – 12 (11.9 %), iohw body/hollow – 1 (0.9 %), dehiscence of anastomosis – 1 (0.9 %); eventtrace – 3 (2.9 %) and seroma postoperative wounds – 2 (1.9 %), hematoma postoperative wound – 1 (0.9 %). Other complications in 12 cases (11.9 %): pneumonia – 8 (7.9 %), thromboembolic complications in 2 (1.9 %), acute cerebrovascular accident – 1 (0.9 %), acute renal failure – 1 (0.9 %).

Conclusion. The most effective method in patients of middle age 40-50 years. compensated pathology, without obvious organ failure, II st. severity of peritonitis by MPI , with abdominal index 13-16 B. The optimal number of sanations is not more than two. Patients of elderly and senile age with decompensated concomitant diseases, severe multiple organ failure and III st. the severity of peritonitis according to MPI requires a revision of surgical management tactics, in the direction of reducing the degree of surgical aggression.

Keywords

common purulent peritonitis, laparostoma, planned sanitation, Mannheim peritonitis index

Author Biographies

Ярослав Миронович Лещишин,
candidate of medical sciences, surgeon
Андрей Игоревич Баранов,
doctor of medical sciences, professor, head of the department of surgery, urology and endoscopy
Константин Владимирович Потехин,
surgeon
Александр Анатольевич Мартынов,
surgeon
Сергей Александрович Ярощук,
candidate of medical sciences, surgeon

Article Details

Information about financing and conflict of interests

The study had no sponsorship.
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

How to Cite

Лещишин, Я. М., Баранов, А. И., Потехин, К. В., Мартынов, А. А., & Ярощук, С. А. (2019). LAPAROSTOMY IN EMERGENCY SURGERY. Medicine in Kuzbass, 18(3), 55-60. https://mednauki.ru/index.php/MK/article/view/370

References

Gostishchev VK, Sazhin VP, Oudovenko AL. Peritonitis. M.: Meditsina, 2001. 240 p. Russian (Гостищев В.К., Сажин В.П., Авдовенко А.Л. Перитонит. М.: Медицина, 2001. 240 с.)

Savel'ev VS, Gel'fand BR, Filimonov MI. Peritonitis: Practical guidelines. M.: Litterra, 2006. 208 p. Russian (Савельев В.С., Гельфанд Б.Р., Филимонов М.И. Перитонит: Практ. руков. М.: Литтерра, 2006. 208 с.)

Torgunakov AP, Torgunakov SA. History of staged treatment of purulent peritonitis by laparotomy (to the 23rd anniversary of the first laparotomy in Kuzbass). Medicine in Kuzbass. 2007; 6(1): 8-11. Russian (Торгунаков А.П., Торгунаков С.А. История этапного лечения гнойного перитонита путем лапаростомии (к 23-летию первой лапаростомии в Кузбассе) //Медицина в Кузбассе. 2007. № 1. С. 8-11)

Sturich IP. Laparostomy and staged rehabilitation of the abdominal cavity in the treatment of severe forms of peritonitis. Vestnik of Vitebsk State Medical University. 2005; 4(3): 5-13. Russian (Штурич И.П. Лапаростомия и этапные санации брюшной полости в лечении тяжелых форм распространенного перитонита //Вестник Витебского Государственного Медицинского Университета. 2005. Т. 4, № 3. С. 5-13)

Federico Coccolini, Walter Biffl, Fausto Catena, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Stefania Cimbanassi et al. The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure. World J Emerg Surg. 2015; 10: 32. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0026-5

Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, Chambers A, Arapova N, Ogston S, Amin AI. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems – historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14(8): 429-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03045.x

Buzunov AF. Laparostomy. Treatment of surgical diseases of the abdomen by the method of open management of the abdominal cavity. M.: Practical medicine, 2008. 200 p. Russian (Бузунов А.Ф. Лапаростомия. Лечение хирургических заболеваний живота методом открытого ведения брюшной полости. М.: Практическая медицина, 2008. 200 с.)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>