NATURAL DELIVERY IN WOMEN WITH A SCAR ON THE UTERUS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The number of women with a scar on the uterus is progressively increasing every year. The study of the course and outcome of labor in women with a scar on the uterus after a cesarean section, conservative myomectomy and uterine perforation will allow a careful selection of women for labor through natural birth canals.
The aim of the research – to analyze the course of pregnancy and childbirth in patients with operated uterus after cesarean section, conservative myomectomy and uterine perforation.
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of 2589 births in women with a scar on the uterus occurred in the perinatal center in three years (2014-2016). Results. Analysis of the clinical material showed that of the 406 patients selected for delivery through the natural birth canal, 76.3 % were genetically conserved. Weakness of labor activity developed in 19.2 % of cases, fetal hypoxia - in 4.4 %, which was the reason of operative delivery. With full term pregnancy and the mature cervix of the uterus, in patients with scar on the uterus, induction of labor with the help of amniotomy is possible. The degree of maturity of the cervix is more likely to indicate the consistency of the scar on the uterus.
Conclusion. Rational management of pregnant women with a scar on the uterus, the correct choice of the method and term of delivery allow to reduce the risk of obstetric and perinatal pathology.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Aylamazyan EK, Serov VN, Radzinskiy VYe, Savel'yeva GM. National leadership. Short edition. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2015. 608 p. Russian (Айламазян Э.К., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е., Савельева Г.М. Акушерство. Национальное руководство. Краткое издание. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2015. 608 с.)
Radzinskiy VYe. Obstetric aggression. M: Publishing house of the magazine Status Preasens, 2011. 688 p. Russian (Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия. М: Издательство журнала Status Preasens, 2011. 688 с.)
Aylamazyan EK, Kuz'minykh TU, Polenov NI, Shelayeva YeV, Kolobov AV. Preparation of pregnant women with a scar on the uterus after cesarean section to deliver. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2008; 57(1): 3-10. Russian (Айламазян Э.К., Кузьминых Т.У., Поленов Н.И., Шелаева Е.В., Колобов А.В. Подготовка беременных с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения к родоразрешению. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2008. № 57(1). С. 3-10)
Adamyan LV, Serov VN. Cesarean section: indications, methods of anesthesia, surgical technique: clinical recommendations. M., 2013. 29 p. Russian (Адамян Л.В., Серов В.Н. Кесарево сечение: показания, методы обезболивания, хирургическая техника: клинические рекомендации. М., 2013. 29 с.)
Samigullina AYe., Vybornykh VA. Indications for cesarean section in modern obstetrics. Science, new technologies and innovations. 2016; 2: 44-47. Russian (Самигуллина А.Е., Выборных В.А. Показания к операции кесарево сечение в современном акушерстве //Наука, новые технологии и инновации. 2016. № 2. С. 44-47)
Krasnopol'skiy VI, Logutova LS, Petrukhin VA, Buyanova SN, Popov AA, Chechneva MA et al. The place of abdominal and vaginal operative delivery in modern obstetrics. Reality and prospects. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 1: 4-8. Russian (Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Петрухин В.А., Буянова С.Н., Попов А.А., Чечнева М.А. и др. Место абдоминального и влагалищного оперативного родоразрешения в современном акушерстве. Реальность и перспективы //Акушерство и гинекология. 2012. № 1. С. 4-8.
Kravchenko YeN, Novosel'tseva NM, Vakulenko MA. Delivery of pregnant women with a scar on the uterus after cesarean section. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2008; 51: 57-59. Russian (Кравченко Е.Н., Новосельцева Н.М., Вакуленко М.А. Родоразрешение беременных с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения //Омский научный вестник. 2008. № 51. С. 57-59)
Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): e0148343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Bangal VB, Giri PA, Shinde KK, Gavhane SP. Vaginal birth after caesarean section. North American Journal of Medicine and Science. 2013; 5(2): 140-144. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.107537
Gabidullina RI, Shamsutdinova LG. On the use of prostaglandin E2 in pregnant women with scar on the uterus after a cesarean section. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2013; 2: 48-51. Russian (Габидуллина Р.И., Шамсутдинова Л.Г. К вопросу о применении простагландина E2 у беременных с рубцом на матке после операции кесарева сечения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2013. № 2. С. 48-51)