Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the research – to identify risk factors and assess maternal and perinatal outcomes in preterm birth, depending on the method of delivery.
Materials and methods. The retrospective study, which included 281 patients with preterm labor. Group I consisted of 150 patients were delivered by caesarean section. Group II (n = 131) included patients who had vaginal delivery. The patients of each group were divided depending on the term of delivery: in the period of 32-36 weeks 6 days, 28-31 weeks 6 days and 22-27 weeks 6 days. Newborns of the two groups were compared according to the state at the time of birth, the length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the neonatal care unit. When analyzing the course of pregnancy, risk factors for preterm birth were identified, and a comparison was made of the course of the postpartum / postoperative period.
Results. Risk factors for preterm birth were identified: moderate preeclampsia – 30 % in the first group and 6.1 % in the second group (p < 0.001), uterine scar after cesarean section 29.3 % in patients of the first group and 6.1 % in patients of the second group (p < 0.001), premature rupture of membranes – 21.3 % and 48.9 %, respectively (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. There was a decrease in the length of stay in the intensive care unit and the neonatal care unit in the group of children born through the natural birth canal. The duration of the time from rupture of membranes to delivery, and the method of delivery in the compared groups did not have a significant impact on the condition of newborns, and did not complicate the course of the postoperative/postpartum period in women.
Adverse outcomes in newborns were in the group with extremely early preterm birth.The authors declare no possible conflicts of interest. The study was conducted without sponsorship.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Skromme K, Vollsæter M, Øymar K, Markestad T, Halvorsen T. Respiratory morbidity through the first decade of life in a national cohort of children born extremely preterm. BMC Pediatr. 2018; 18(1): 102. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1045-7
Newnham JP, Schilling C, Petrou S, Morris JM, Wallace EM, Brown K, et al. The health and educational costs of preterm birth to 18 years of age in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 62(1): 55-61. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13405
Kim SW, Andronis L, Seppänen AV, Aubert AM, Zeitlin J, Barros H, et al. Economic costs at age five associated with very preterm birth: multinational European cohort study. Pediatr Res. 2022; 92(3): 700-711. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01769-z
Guo X, Li X, Qi T, Pan Z, Zhu X, Wang H, et al. A birth population-based survey of preterm morbidity and mortality by gestational age. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 291. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03726-4
Koullali B, van Zij MD, Kazemier BM, Oudijk MA, Mol BWJ, Pajkrt E, Ravelli ACJ. The association between parity and spontaneous preterm birth: A population based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1): 233. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02940-w
Alamneh TS, Teshale AB, Worku MG, Tessema ZT, Yeshaw Y, Tesema GA, et al. Preterm birth and its associated factors among reproductive aged women in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from the recent demographic and health surveys of sub-Sharan African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04233-2
Putora K, Hornung R, Kinkel J, Fischer T, Putora PM. Progesterone, cervical cerclage or cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth: a decision-making analysis of international guidelines. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1): 355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04584-4
FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: Prediction of preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019; 144(3): 340-346. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12744
Melchor JC, Khalil A, Wing D, Schleussner E, Surbek D. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women using PAMG-1, fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1 tests: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52(4): 442-451. doi: 10.1002/uog.19119
Mwita S, Jande M, Katabalo D, Kamala B, Dewey D. Reducing neonatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome associated with preterm birth: a scoping review on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries. World J Pediatr. 2021; 17(2): 131-140. doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00398-6
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219(1): 10-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028
Dawes L, Groom K, Jordan V, Waugh J. The use of specialised preterm birth clinics for women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1): 58. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2731-7
Jarde A, Feng YY, Viaje KA, Shah PS, McDonald SD. Vaginal birth vs caesarean section for extremely preterm vertex infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(2): 447-458. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05417-0
Rohwer AC, Oladapo OT, Hofmeyr GJ. Strategies for optimising antenatal corticosteroid administration for women with anticipated preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 5(5): CD013633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013633
Osteen SJ, Yang Z, Mckinzie AH, Teal E, Tepper RS, Rhoads E, et al. Long-term childhood outcomes for babies born at term who were exposed to antenatal corticosteroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 228(1): 80.e1-80.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.026